| In this page we introduce the morphological relation ship between members of the gurage people. if you have any research papers or comments on this part or other related information please send to us using our e mail address guragezone@yahoo.com. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Classification In this article I intended to classify the morphological relation between Soddo , Muher and Dobbi . 1.
Copula : - The Copulas ( verb of identities ) such as ' he is , she is ... '
are of the same forms far all SMD , except for 3d fem . Sg . ' she
is ' , for which Muher has - ya , where as Soddo and Dobbi have - na . Singular form
Plural form
In
the structure ' it is mine '
and soon an element - tt- is placed between the copula and the pronoun
( subject) in all Soddo , Muher and Dobbi . Sodo
Muher
Do ädi
- tt(∂) näw
anä -tt-(∂) nx
anä -tt-(∂) nähu The past copula ' he was not ' is expressed
by banno both in Dobbi and Muher , whereas in Soddo , it is expressed by näbbärä
.
Plural
form
The
negation of the past copula '
he was not ' is expressed by an - näbärä , which is the same for all
Soddo , Muher and Dobbi . The future verb of identity ( copula ) ' he
will be ' and so on is expressed by the imperfect of the verb konä '
become , be ' both in Dobbi and Soddo , and xänä in Muher .
Plural
2.
Verb of existence : the verb of existence
persence ' there
is / are ' is expressed by y∂no in Soddo and Dobbi , in Muher it is
expressed by näno. Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
y∂nähi
nänxwi
y∂nähwi 2d
masc
y∂näh∂mun
nänx∂mut
y∂näh∂mun 2d
fem
y∂näh∂man
nänx∂mat
y∂näh∂man 3d
masc y∂nämun
nänmut
y∂nämun 3d
fem
y∂näman
nänmat y∂näman
-
Note the labialization of h in Dobbi ,unlike Soddo , in the 1st .
Sg . The negative of the verb of existence
' there is not ' is expressed by yennä in
Muher which aprees with ennäin Dobbi . In Soddo it is expressed by
yällä . Sg So
Mu
Do 1st
yälläw
yennäxu
ennähu 2d
masc
yällähä
yennäxä
ennähä 2d
fem
yälläš
yennänx'
ennähä 3d
masc yällä
yennä
ennä 3d
fem yällätt
yennäčč
ennätt Pl
- 1st
yällänä
yennänä
ennänä 2d
masc
yälläh∂m
yennäx∂mw
ennäh∂mw 2d
fem
yälläh∂ma
yennäx∂ma
ennäx∂ma 3d
masc
yäll∂m
enn∂mw
enn∂mw 3d
fem
yäll∂ma
yenn∂ma
enn∂ma The verb of existance in the past ' there was
' is expressed by banno both in Muher and Dobbi , where as in Soddo it is
expressed by näbbärä . They are of the same conjugation with the past
verb of identity ( copula ). 3.
Verb of possession : the verb of possession
' he has ' is expressed by y∂nän∂t both in Dobbi and
Soddo , where as in Muher it is expressed by nänänn∂t. Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
y∂new
nänew
y∂new 2d
masc
y∂nänäho
nänännaxo y∂nännho
2d
fem
y∂nän∂šu
nänännax'u y∂nänn∂šu
3d
masc
y∂nän∂t
nänänn∂t
y∂nänn∂t 3d
fem
y∂nänat
nänännat
y∂nännat Pl
- 1st
y∂näno
nänäno
y∂nänno 2d
masc
y∂nänäh∂mun nänännax∂mum
y∂nänn∂h∂mun
2d
fem
y∂näh∂man
nänännax∂mam
y∂nänn∂h∂man
3d
masc
y∂nänämum
nänännämut
y∂nänn∂mun 3d
fem
y∂nänäman
nänännämat
y∂nänn∂man The negative verb of possession ' he has not
' is expressed by yällän in Soddo , whereas ennän both in Dobbi and
Muher . Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
yällähä
ennew
ennew 2d
masc yällähä
ennännaxä
ennänähä
2d
fem
yällän∂š
ennännax'
ennän∂š 3d
masc
yällän
ennänn
ennän 3d
fem
yälläna
ennänna
ennänna Pl
- Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
yällänä
ennännä
ennänä 2d
masc
yällän∂h∂m
ennännax∂mw ennänh∂mw 2d
fem
yällän∂h∂ma
ennännax∂ma
ennänh∂ma 3d
masc
yällänäma
ennännämw
ennän∂mw 3d
fem
yällänäma
ennännäma
ennänma The
past possession ' he had ' ,
in Muher and Dobbi , is expressed by bannän∂t ', where as in Soddo
it is expressed by näbbäränn Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
näbbäre
bannew
bannew 2d
masc
näbbäränähä
bannännaxo
bannänn∂ho
2d
fem
näbbärän∂š
bannännax'u
bannänn∂šu
3d
masc näbbärän
bannänn∂t
bannänn∂t 3d
fem näbbäränna
bannännat
bannännat Pl
- 1st
näbbäränä
bannänno
bannänno 2d
masc
näbbäräh∂m bannännax∂mut bannännah∂mun
2d
fem
näbbäräh∂m bannännax∂mat
bannännah∂mun
3d
masc
näbbäränäm
bannännämut
bannänn∂mun 3d
fem näbbäränäma
bannännämat
bannänn∂man The negation of the past verb of possession
' he had not ' is expressed by alnäbärä in Soddo , where as
Muher and Dobbi have the same form annäbärä . Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
annäbäre
annäbäre 2d
masc
annäbärännaxä
annäbäränäš
2d
fem
annäbärännax'i
annäbäränäš 3d
masc
annäbäränn
annäbärän
3d
fem
annäbäränna
annäbäräna Pl
- 1st
annäbäränä
annäbäränä 2d
masc
annäbärännax∂mw annäbäränäx∂ma
2d
fem
annäbärännax∂ma
annäbäränäx∂mw
3d
masc
annäbärännämw
annäbäränäm 3d
fem
annäbärännäma
annäbäränämw
-
Possession in the futrure '
he will have ' is expressed by y∂näbr∂t in all Soddo , Muher
and Dobbi . Sg
So
Mu
Do 1st
y∂näbrew
y∂näbrew
y∂näbrew 2d
masc
y∂näbr∂ho
y∂änäbr∂xo y∂näbr∂hu
2d
fem
y∂näbr∂š∂n
y∂näbr∂x'u y∂näbr∂šu
3d
masc
y∂näbr∂t
y∂näw∂rr∂t* y∂näbr∂t
3d
fem
y∂näbrat
y∂näbrat
y∂näbrat Pl
- 1st
y∂näbräno
y∂näbräno
y∂näbräno 2d
masc
y∂näbr∂h∂mun y∂näbr∂x∂mut
y∂näbr∂h∂mun
2d
fem
y∂näbr∂h∂man
y∂näbr∂x∂mat
y∂näbr∂h∂man 3d
masc y∂näbrämun
y∂näbrrämut
y∂näbrämun 3d
fem
y∂näbräman
y∂näbrrämat
y∂näbräman
* Note that in the 3d , masc . Sg . b changes to w in Muher
while geminating the last radical . The
negation of the verb of possession in the future ' he will not have ' is
expressed by tinäb∂rr in Soddo ,while
in Dobbi and Muher it is expressed by enäb∂r. Pl
- 1st
tinäbränä
enäbränä
enäbränä 2d
masc
tinäbr∂h∂m enänäbr∂x∂mw enäbr∂h∂mun
2d
fem
tinäbr∂h∂ma enäbr∂x∂ma
enäbr∂h∂man 3d
masc tinäb∂rräm
enänäbr∂mw
enäbr∂mun 3d
fem
tinäb∂rräma
enäb∂räma
enäbr∂äman 4. Article
: Soddo and Dobbi have definite article - i , where as in Muher defitness
is expressed by - we
Gender : the dialects under discussion have no gender markers .
However , these dialects use noun qualifiers ∂ns∂t/an∂st
and täbät distination for feminine and masculine respectiviley .
. Muher also uses w∂r for masculine
. 5. Number
: Dobbi and Soddo express plurality by repeting the last radical. Soddo
has also - očč . Muher has no plural marker . Inspite of these
differences all the dialects under disucussion have common way of
expressing plurality for few
noun , i.e by internal plural .
So
Mu
Do Sg
-
goš ' boy '
gyäräd ' girl '
gärad ' girl '
Pl -
agušt ' boys '
* gred ' girls ' gred
' girls ' 6
*
In semetic languages we find no word having cluster of consonant
atthe word initial , how ever,
if the second radical in a word is r , then cluster of consonants will
occur . Sg Soddo
Muher
Dobbi 1st
ädi
anä
anä 2d
masc dähä
axä
aha
2d
fem
däš
ax'
aš
3d
masc
kwa
xwa
xwa
3d
fem
kiya
x'a
kiya
Pl
-
1st
∂ňňa
∂ňňa
∂ňňa
2d
masc
däh∂m ax∂mw
ah∂mw 2d
fem
däh∂ma ax∂ma
ah∂ma 3d
masc k∂nnäm x∂nnämw
k∂nnämw 3d
fem
k∂nnäma x∂nnäma
k∂nnäma In the preceding full paradigm of personal
pronoun Soddo has different forms from Dobbi and Muher in 1st . Sg and 2d Pl . and Sg . 7. Possessive pronoun : as to the possessive pronouns Dobbi and
Muher are placed together and Soddo stands alone . Sg
-
So Mu
Do 1st
∂ddi
äňňa
äňňa
2d
masc
dä
axä
ahä 2d
fem
däš
ax'
aš 3d
masc äw/hwan
kuta
huta 3d
fem
ki
xita
hita Pl
-
1st
∂ňňa
∂ňňa
∂ňňa
2d
masc
däh∂m ax∂ma
ah∂ma
2d
fem
däh∂ma ax∂mw
ah∂mw 3d
masc k∂nnäm x∂nnämw
k∂nnämw 3d
fem
k∂nnäma x∂nnäma
k∂nnäma
From the above full paradigm , Soddo
has the same form with that of Muher and Dobbi
only in 3d Pl . masc
and fem . -
The possessive prefix ' of ' is in all Dobbi , Muher and Soddo is
expressed by yä . -
The form ' own ' expressing possession is expressed by ras / gäza
both in Dobbi and Soddo , and by gäg in Muher . 8.
Prepesitional suffix pronoun : In the Adverse and Benefactive
pronouns ,Muher and Dobbi are placed together , while Soddo stands alone
only in benefactive pronoun .
( 1 ) Adverse
Sg -
So
Mu
Do 1st
bi
bi
bi
2d
fem
bä
bx'
bši 2d
masc
ba
ba
ba 3d
masc
wo
wo
wo Pl - 1st
bnä
bnä
bnä
2d fem
bk∂mam
bx∂ma
bk∂ma 2d
masc bk∂mum
bx∂mu
bk∂mu 3d
fem bämam
bäma
bäma 3d
masc bämum
bämu
bämu
( 2 ) Benefactive Sg -
So
Mu
Do 1st
li
ni
ni
2d
masc
lkä
nxä nkä
2d
fem
lš
nx'i
nši 3d
masc
lä
no
no 3d
fem
la
na
na Pl
- 1st
l∂nä
n∂nä
n∂nä
2d masc lk∂mum
nx∂mu
nk∂mu 2d
fem
lk∂mam
nx∂ma
nk∂ma 3d
masc lämu
nämu
nämu 3d
fem
läma
näma
näma 9.
Reciprocal pronoun : the form
' each other or one another is
expressed , in these dialects , by repeting the plural independent
personal pronouns , they being combined by an element bä . 10.
Demonstrative pronouns
: the form ' that , this ' and so on have the same forms in these dialects
. For farness they use the form za '
that , those ' and for nearness they use zi ' this , these ' -
In the definite demonstrative pronouns marker such as ' that one ,
this one ' etc Muher and Dobbi use the definite marker - we -
where as Soddo use an element - ni -
( for singular ) and - nočč ( for plural ) .
So
Mu
Do Sg - Zi
- ni ' this one '
Zi-we ' this one '
Zi-we ' this one ' Pl - Zi
- nočč ' these ones ' Zi-we
' these ones ' Zi - we '
these ones ' 11.
The Emphatic pronoun ' he himself ' is expressed in Dobbi and Soddo
by an element (ä) ras - prefixed to possessive pronoun , where as in
Muher it is expressed by gäg ' body ' - prefixed to possessive pronouns .
So
Mu
D (ä)
ras - ∂ddi
gäg- äňňa (ä)
ras - äňňa ' I-myself '
' I - myself '
' I - myself ' 12. Verb : The verbs of Soddo , Muher and Dobbi are uniradical , biradical , triradical , Quadriradical and composite . In all these dialects most of the triradicals and biradicals are
of type A,B and C . 12.1
Tri - radicals : Type A - perfect . In these dialects under discussion ,
type A is characterized by the non gemination of the 2d radical except in
the perfect form . In all these dialects the perfective ends with - m . Sg -
So
Mu
D 1st
märrärkum
wärräsxum
läggädkum 2d masc märrärkum
wärräsxäm
läggädkäm 2d
fem
märrärš∂m
wärräsx'im
läggädšim 3d
masc märrrärm
wärräsäm
läggädäm 3d
fem
märrärätt∂m
wärräsäčč∂m
läggädätt∂m Pl
- 1st
märrärnäm
wärräsnäm
läggädnäm 2d masc märräk∂mum
wärräsx∂mum läggädk∂mum 2d
fem
märräräk∂mam wärräsx∂mam
läggädk∂mam 3d
masc märrärmum wärräsmum
läggädmum 3d
fem
märrärmam wärräsmam
läggädmam Imperfect
- The 2d . fem . Sg . in the
imperfet has the suffix - in Soddo
and Dobbi , while in Muher it is - it . Sg
-
So
Mu
Do 2d
fem
t∂merrin
t∂wäršit
t∂legğin -
In Soddo , Muher and Dobbi , in the 2d fem . Sg . if the last
radical is subject to
prepalatalization , it is prepalatized . Howerver , at the same time the
vowel between the 1st and 2d radical becomes fronted
(e) both only in Soddo and Dobbi . Sg -
So
Mu Do 2d fem
t∂merrin
t∂wäršit
t∂legğin - From the above examples under Soddo in the
imperfect t∂merrin the last radical
(from mrr) is not subject to prepalatalization and thus only the
vowel ä becomes
fronted . Under Muher the imperfect t∂wäršit
(from wrs) the last radical is subject to preoalatalizatoib, and it
becomes prepalatalized , but the vowel remains preserved , under Dobbi in
the imperfect t∂legğin ( from lgd) the last radical is subject
to prepalatalization and , became prepalatalized at the same time the
vowel between the 2d and last
radical becomes fronted. Jussive - All Soddo , Muher and Dobbi have c1 c2
∂c3 and
c1 c2 ä c3 jussive forms .
However , the occurances of these two jussive forms differ in the three
dialects under discussion .
In Soddo c1 c2 ä c3 occurs in verbs where the jussive prefix ends with the vowel
∂ . In this case the jussive prefixes of the 1st Pl . and 3d . Sg
.fem - (∂nn∂ and t∂ - respectively) ends with the vowel
∂ . And c1 c2
∂c2 occurs where the jussive prefix ends with vowel ä . In this
case the jussive prefixes of 3dSg . fem , 1st . Sg , and 3 . Pl . masc and
fem . ( nä, yä, yä respectively ) .end with the vowel ä . The forms
are : Sg 1st
näwr∂d
3d fem
t∂wräd 3d
masc
yäwr∂d
1st
∂nn∂wräd
3d fem yäwr∂dma 3d
masc yäwr∂d∂m In
Muher c1
c2 ä c3 occurs in the intransitive verbs , and c1
c2 ∂c3 occurs in the transitive verbs . The
forms are : c1
c2 ä c3
c1 c2 ∂c3 Sg 1st n∂mrär
Sg n∂wr∂ 3d fem t∂mrär
y∂r∂sma 3d
masc yämrär
y∂wr∂s∂snä Pl
- 1st n∂mrärnä
Pl - n∂wr∂snä 3d fem
yämrärma
y∂wr∂sma 3d
masc
yämrär∂wm
y∂wr∂s∂s∂wm In
Dobbi c1 c2
ä c3 occurs in verbs with 1st radical w, and c1 c2
∂c3 occurs
in other verbs . c1 c2 ä c3
c1 c2 ∂c3 Sg
- 1st n∂wräd
Sg n∂lg∂d 3d
fem t∂wräd
t∂lg∂d 3d masc
yäwräd
yälg∂d Pl
- 1st
n∂wrädnä
Pl - n∂lg∂dnä 3d masc
yäwrädnä
yälg∂d∂mw 3d
fem yäwrädma
yälg∂dma Imperative
- In Soddo and Dobbi the imperative has c1 c2 ä c3
pattern , while the 2d . fem . Sg - has a fronted vowel (e) , and the last
radical , if it can be prepalatalized , becomes prepalatalized . In
Muher the pattern of Imperative is the same as in the jussive , i.e , if
the verb is transitive , it has c1 c2 ∂c3
and if it is intransitive , it has c1 c2 ä c3
patterns. As
in Soddo and Dobbi , the 2d fem . Sg in Muher prepalatalizes the last
radical . However , the vowel does not become fronted Muher e.
Soddo
Dobbi c1
c2 ∂c3 c1 c2 ä c3
Sg 2d masc
w∂räd
l∂gäd
w∂rs
n∂räd 2d
fem
w∂reǰ
l∂geǰ w∂rš
w∂räš Pl
. 2d masc
w∂räd∂m
l∂gäd∂mw w∂rs∂mw
w∂räd∂mw
2d
fem
w∂rädma
l∂gädma
w∂rs∂ma w∂rädma
Infinitive / verbal noun in . In all the
dialects under discussion an infinitve is formed by the prefix wä - Thus. So
Mu
D wät'r∂g
wäwr∂s
wägf∂r Type
B
- In these dialects type B is characterized by the gemination of the 2d
radical in all the verb forms . The prefixes and suffixes of the various
verb forms are the same as those of type A.
So
Mu
Do perfect
mirräk'äm
kämmäräm
gebbäräm imperfect
y∂mirr∂k'u
y∂kämm∂ru y∂gebbru Jussive
yämärr∂k'u
yäkämm∂ru yägäbb∂r Imperative
märr∂k'
kämm∂r
gäbb∂r infinitive
wämärr∂k'
wäkämm∂r
wägäbb∂r -
Note that the jussive has c1
ä c2 c2 ∂c3 patter
in all these dialects in type B . -
The Imperative has c1 ä c2
c2 c2 ∂c3
pattern in these dialects except in 2d fem . Sg . in Dobbi and
Soddo . In Soddo 2d fem - Sg - has c1 e c2 c2
ic3 pattern and Dobbi has c1 ä c2
c2 ic3
pattern. In these dialects if the last radical can be prepalataized , it
becames perpalatalized . Type
C
. In these dialects type C is characterized by the gemination of the 2d
radical only in perfect and imperfect form. The suffixes and the prefixes
in various verb forms are the same with those of type Aand /orB.
So
Mu
Do Perfect
tarräkkäm
barräxxäm
tatt'äbäm Imperfect
y∂tarräk'u
y∂barr∂xu
y∂tatt'äbu Jussive
yätaräk'
yäbarx
tat'äb Imperative
taräk'
barx
tat'äb Infinitive
wätaräk'
wäbarx
wätatt'∂b
Note that in type C Dobbi and Soddo have c1 ä c2
c3 Jussive
pattern , where as Muher has c1 a c2
c3 jussive
pattern. The imperative has the same pattern as that of the jussive except that in Dobbi and Soddo the 2d fem . Sg . has the fronted vowel -e after 2d radical . In all cases the last radical becomes prepalatalized if it can be prepalatalized . 12.2 Gender in the verb : - All the verb forms , that is , perfect , imperfect , Jussive , imperative make a distinction between masculine and feminine in the 2d and 3d persons, plural in Dobbi , Soddo and Muher . 2d
Soddo
Muher
Dobbi Perfect
k∂mum
(masc.)
- x∂mum
- k∂mum
k∂mam (masc.)
- x∂mam
- k∂mam Imperfect
mum (masc.)
- mut
- mun
mam (masc.)
- mat
- man Imperative
∂m (masc.)
- ∂mw
- ∂mw
∂m (fem)
- ma
- ma 3d Perfect
mum (masc.)
- mum
- mum
mam (fem)
- mam
- mam Imperfect
mum (masc.)
- mut
- mun
mam (masc.)
- mat
- man Jussive ∂m (masc.)
- ∂mw
- ∂mw
ma (fem)
- ma
- ma Perfect : In
Soddo , Muher and Dobbi the perfect ends with an element suffix - m. The suffix of the 3d Sg . fem . is . tt∂m both in Dobbi and Soddo , where as in Muher it is - čč∂m. Imperfect : The suffix of the 2d fem . Sg . , in Dobbi and
Muher , is - in where as in Muher it is - it .
The suffix of the 1st . Pl . in Muher and Dobbi is - no , while - u
is in Soddo .
The prefix of the 1st Pl . in Muher and Dobbi is n∂ - , where
as in Soddo it is ∂nn∂ - . Jussive : The prefix of the 1st . Pl . in Muher and
Dobbi is n∂- , while nä - is in Soddo . The suffix of the 1st - Pl - in Dobbi and Muher is nä , where as Soddo has zero . 12.3 Biradicals :- All Dobbi , Muher and Soddo have biradical verbs . And these verbs have type A , B , and C and other special class .
Muher and Dobbi share the same biradical verbs than Soddo does .
Muher and Soddo share special biradical verbs such as class ' bännam' ,
class ' s∂ram ' class ' beäm' , žoaräm ' and others which Soddo does not .
In special triradical verbs Muher and Dobbi share class ' messeäm' class '
čäkkeäm ' with the forms of their derived stems , but Soddo
does not have such a special triradical verbs . Uniradicals
All Dobbi , Muher and Soddo have uniradical verbs . Soddo and Dobbi
have only šäm , Muher has only šäm and čäm Dobbi
Muher
Soddo šäm
šäm
šäm
čäm 12.4 Quadriradical :- This class has two types in Dobbi : type
one :
ä after the second radical type
two : a after the
second radical
In Soddo and Muher it has one type : ä ater the 2d radical . Thus
,
12.5 Composite Verbs :- These verbs consists of the verb baläm ' say ' in Soddo , where as in Muher and Dobbi it consists of the verb beäm ' say ' . Thus ,
12.6 Derived Stems :- Dobbi , Muher and Soddo have various stems derived from the basic stem .Reduplicative stem : The forms ( structure ) of reduplicative stem are the same in the three dialects . Sodo Muher Dobbi
s∂bäbbäräm
l∂gäggädäm
k∂fäffätäm -
tä - stem - This stem is the same in the three dialects . Sodo Muher Dobbi
tägäddäläm
tä?ätt'am
täsäbbäräm -
In all these dialects three are verbs that do not have basic stem
and their meanings are expressed by ta - stem . Sodo muher Dobbi tägmwammät'äm
tägaddeäm täse'äm
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||